OK, I have one last thing to say about Proposition 8 and then I'll stop (for now):
What is marriage if not the acceptance of a voluntary obligation to support another person as a family member?
Why is that so difficult for people to accept? If an individual in a homosexual union chooses to accept all the same responsibilities, in the eyes of the law, that I have chosen to accept in my heterosexual union, who am I-- indeed who are you?-- to deny them the right to do so? Why is his or her marriage any different in the eyes of the law?
I believe people have every right, in their personal choices and actions, to follow their beliefs, be they based on religious tradition or otherwise, and personally reject the legitimacy of gay marriage. I believe in and respect the right of any church or religion to oppose the concept of gay marriage and/or of homosexual relationships.
But one's personal beliefs and religious practices should have no bearing of how the law respects individual rights and privacy.
(Thanks to my friend Julie for helping me really crystalize my thoughts on this and articulate it better that "For Pete's sake, what is wrong with you?")
Go See it:
So, I have a movie recommendation. A friend lent it to us, and I have to admit, I wasn't very interested. But after watching, it I give it a thumbs up. So go out and rent Brick.
It is a detective story of sorts. The characters are high school drug dealers. When a young guy's girlfriend turns up dead, he goes to extraordinary lengths to find out what happened. Think "The Usual Suspects" meets "Heathers" (for those of you old enough to remember Heathers, that is), meets teen angst, but edgier. I thought it was a really well done film and story. The actors are really good as well. My only hurdle was that I kept thinking "Dude! These are so not high school students!" But hey, willful suspension of disbelief and all that. Here is a nice review of the film (though they did get the name of the girlfriend wrong, hmmmm).
Go read it:
The 19th Wife. Realy nice novel. Not nice like pleasant; nice like, well written, compelling story, well balanced mix of fact & fiction playing off of one another. Again, it's in that murder mystery/detective genre. Sort of. And it's historical fiction. Sort of.
The 19th Wife weaves together the tale of Brigham Young's apostate wife Ann Eliza (#19) and the 19th wife of a modern day polygamist who is murdered in the basement of the home he shares with 25 or so wives and so many kids no one keeps count. The excommunicated son of the modern day wife #19 unfurls a puzzle that leads straight back to Ann Eliza Young and the legacy that brought his family to where it is today.
The author aptly blends the memoirs of Ann Eliza with his own fictional liberties, never losing touch with 19th century pioneer religious fervor. And he almost seamlessly ties the two stories together, leaving no doubt that the legacy of polygamy had wrought the awful consequences of a contemporary murder mystery.
I enjoyed the book throughout, even with a few sloppy story lines that detracted from the rich and authentic feeling of the main plot line. And if you've ever been to, or even heard of, Colorado City (formerly Short Creek) you will thoroughly enjoy trying to envision the scenes in their place in the desert.
